兄弟连

China says EU's probe into e-commerce giant JD.com unlawful_我的网站

阿凡达

A | China's Ministry of Justice on Wednesday said that the European Union's (EU's) recent cross-border investigation into Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation (FSR) has constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. The ministry said in a statement that no organization or individual may comply with or assist in implementing the EU's unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures. The ministry's statement came after the European Commission announced an investigation into JD.com's proposed takeover of German retailer Ceconomy in May. In the statement, the ministry said the conclusion followed an investigation conducted under China's rules on countering foreign states' unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction measures, which were issued in April this year. According to the rules, the Chinese government has the authority to take countermeasures in response to extraterritorial jurisdiction measures by a foreign country that violate international law and the basic norms governing international relations and that harm China's sovereignty, security and development interests, or the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese citizens and organizations. In May, citing the same set of rules, the ministry said that the EU's probe into Chinese security check company Nuctech constituted unlawful extraterritorial jurisdiction. A spokesperson with the Ministry of Justice on Wednesday said the EU's probe, under the bloc's FSR effective since 2023, has arbitrarily demanded broad and unnecessary information located in China, which is a serious violation of the international rule of law. "China will resolutely take countermeasures in accordance with the law if the EU side were to insist on the wrong course," the spokesperson said. The spokesperson urged the EU to immediately correct its wrong practices, stop abusing the FSR as a tool, and foster a fair, impartial and predictable environment for companies investing and operating in the EU market. 。

B | 据《福克斯新闻》1月11日报道，《北京时间》报道，亚马逊首席执行官贝佐斯周三宣布，他和妻子麦肯齐将结束25年的婚姻，这让很多人对这位世界首富将面临的1370亿美元资产感到疑惑。据最新报道，这对夫妇没有签署婚前协议，使贝索斯的大量资产面临风险。据美国娱乐新闻网站TMZ援引“知情人士”的消息来源，贝佐斯夫妇没有签署婚前协议，因此他们的资产将被分割，但莫莉B.肯尼律师事务所的莫莉肯尼（Molly B.Kenny）表示，财产分割不一定是五分之五。

C | 根据法律的定义，离婚夫妻的财产分割必须“公平公正”。这不一定是一个半点半的观点，无论是法令还是相关的法律都是一样的，”肯尼说。

D | 但是华盛顿特区家庭法组织的律师劳里·罗伯逊指出，法院可能认为贝索斯的婚姻是一场“长期婚姻”，这可能“使双方在财产和未来收入方面处于类似的财务状况。”肯尼补充说，由于贝索斯的大部分资产都与亚马逊股票挂钩，这场政变Le有很多方法来分配他们的资产，考虑到这些股份是以贝索斯的名义持有的，投票权不应该成为问题。”这是可以商量的，但这不应该是一个大问题，因为她没有参与公司的运作，”肯尼说。她的兴趣是公司继续发展、成功和盈利。